When her son died of burns after a bath, police say she took a Lyft and dumped his body in a dumpster

BALTIMORE (WITI) -- A Baltimore mother and her partner have been charged in connection with the death of a missing 4-year-old boy, whose body was found days later in a dumpster.

Alicia Lawson, 25, reported her son, Malachi, missing to Baltimore police on August 1. She said Malachi disappeared from the front doorstep of her northwest Baltimore home after she stepped inside momentarily, according to a statement of probable cause.

The report sparked a frantic search by local and federal authorities.

Two days later, police said, the mother confessed that her son wasn't missing, but dead. Lawson gave police the location of the boy's remains. Police recovered Malachi's body in a trash bag in the dumpster, court papers said. The boy died after the couple decided not to seek medical treatment, court papers said.

Lawson and her partner, Shatika Lawson were taken into custody on Saturday. They have been charged with several offenses, including involuntary manslaughter; assault; first-degree child abuse resulting in the death of a child younger than 13 years old, neglect of a minor and giving false statements.

The state Office of the Public Defender, which is representing Alicia Lawson, declined to comment. It was not immediately clear if Shatika Lawson had an attorney.

They didn't call for help

The women told police they were bathing Malachi on July 23 after he soiled himself, court documents said. The two put the boy in the tub and turned to wash his clothes in the sink, court papers said. Shatika Lawson told police she put the boy in the tub, the papers said.

They said that when they turned back around to the child, he had suffered serious burns on his lower body, from his waist to his feet, according to court papers.

But neither of them wanted to seek medical help and instead opted to treat his wounds on their own, the probable cause statement said.

They were both afraid “the child would be taken from them, that they would get in trouble for what had happened to the child” and because of their “past history with child protective services,” the document said.